Monday, November 13, 2006

Anderson Cooper Headed to Iraq?

The word on the street is that CNN's Anderson Cooper is headed to Iraq in the next couple of weeks. Hey, I was fine sending John Roberts...not so down with sending Coop. Although, that might mean more face time for Michael Ware and I do love his reporting...

Reporters in Iraq face snipers, roadside bombs and kidnappings


By DAVID RISING
Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) _ Western journalists covering the war in Iraq face sniper fire, roadside bombs, kidnappers and a host of other dangers. Their Iraqi colleagues must cope with even greater risks, including families attacked in retribution for sensitive reporting, and arrest on suspicion of links to the violence journalists cover.

At least 85 journalists -- mostly Iraqis -- have been killed since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003 -- more than in either Vietnam or World War II. The security situation is getting progressively worse, and 2006 has been the deadliest year yet, with at least 25 journalists killed to date.

Gunmen carried out the deadliest attack yet on the media on Thursday. Some two dozen armed men, some in police uniform, stormed the downtown Baghdad headquarters of a new satellite television station, killing the board chairman and 10 others.

The motive for the attack on Shaabiya TV was not clear, though there were signs it was carried out by Shiite militiamen. Sunnis say the militias often have help from police. In its few short broadcasts, the station played nationalist music against the U.S. occupation, perhaps prompting militiamen to assume it sympathized with Sunni insurgents.

"Iraq is the most dangerous assignment in the world right now for journalists," said Joel Campagna, head of the Mideast desk of the Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based media rights group that keeps the count.

"There really aren't any battle lines. The danger begins right outside your door," he said.

Covering any war is dangerous, and journalists have been killed or wounded in Afghanistan, Sierra Leone, Bosnia and other recent conflicts -- in addition to 66 in Vietnam, 17 in Korea and 68 during World War II.

Western journalists have been targeted in Iraq by insurgents who consider them little different from combatants. Baghdad's Palestine Hotel -- where many media organizations, including The Associated Press, have been based -- was attacked several times including in a triple suicide vehicle bombing last October claimed by al-Qaida in Iraq.

On Wednesday, the body of a Kurdish radio reporter was identified at the Baghdad morgue. Azad Mohammed Hussein was abducted Oct.3 in Baghdad while on his way to Dar al-Salam radio headquarters, and his body was found dumped on Tuesday.

One of Iraq's best-known television journalists, Atwar Bahjat, and two of her colleagues were abducted and slain while reporting on an explosion in February at a mosque in Samarra.

Not all the threats faced by Iraqi journalists come from the insurgents.

In September, Kalshan al-Bayati, whose reporting had been critical of security forces in Tikrit, was arrested twice by the Iraqi army for alleged terrorist links, and remains in custody.

AP photographer Bilal Hussein was detained in April and remains in U.S. custody without any charges against him.

According to CPJ, at least eight journalists have been detained for weeks or months by Iraqi and coalition forces. They include employees of CBS News, Reuters, the AP and Agence France-Presse among others. At least four of the detentions have exceeded 100 days, Campagna said.

In the early months of the war, Western journalists could move about in relative safety in cities like Baghdad, Mosul and even Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit armed with nothing more than a notepad and a pen.

Before the resumption of commercial flights, most journalists arrived in Baghdad by car, either traveling north from Kuwait or east from Jordan along a route that took them near current insurgent hotbeds such as Ramadi and Fallujah.

All that changed in 2004 with an increase in violence, kidnapping and slaying of Westerners. Journalists from the United States, Poland, Japan, Italy and France were kidnapped or killed.

In January, Christian Science Monitor reporter Jill Carroll was abducted by Sunni extremists and freed unharmed 82 days later.

With security in a free-fall, news organizations have taken on extra measures to protect their staff while still reporting as best they can on a complex and violent conflict.

Some journalists, including most freelancers, have left the country. Those news organizations that remain use a handful of U.S. and other Western staffers and rely heavily on their Iraqi reporters, who venture out to the scenes of bombings, suicide attacks and gunfights at great risk.

"The Western reporter has some training on how to cover events in hot areas -- he has better knowledge on when to appear and when to vanish, when there is a danger while covering the news," said Qais al-Azawi, chief editor of Baghdad's al-Jareeda newspaper.

"Moreover, the Western reporters have better protection equipment such as flak jackets. The Iraqi reporters do not have such privileges," he said.

Western journalists, including those from The Associated Press, often live and work in guarded compounds, most outside the U.S.-controlled Green Zone. They venture out to report but usually with armed security escorts.

Security measures to protect staff have driven up costs.

Dexter Filkins, who spent nearly three years covering Iraq for The New York Times, said in a recent talk that his newspaper goes through money like "jet fuel" to protect its reporters in Iraq.

With travel sharply limited, many news organizations, including the AP, periodically embed reporters with U.S. military units. But the number of embeds has waned in recent months from hundreds at a time in the early months of the way to an average of 15 over recent weeks, according to Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, a U.S. military spokesman.

Out in the field, non-embedded journalists are often at scenes of violence and are regularly among the first people there, which can lead to confusion, Johnson said. Insurgents are also known to take videos and pictures of their own attacks to use as future propaganda, and Johnson said soldiers are well within their rights to detain people at the scenes of violence to ensure that they are truly journalists.

"It's a very, very difficult environment and we would rather have our troops be safe by detaining and questioning somebody on why they are there, than let them go and find out they were complicit," Johnson said.

Al-Azawi, the chief editor of al-Jareeda, said in a telephone interview from Paris he is spending more and more time at his home in France for his own safety.

"The warring factions in the country do not respect any law that calls for the protection of the journalists," he said. "Journalism is the most dangerous occupation in Iraq now."

7 comentarios:

Cyn said...

I've read that it was during the appearance in Buffalo that he mentioned he is heading to Iraq in a couple of weeks.

BTW, I have a website of Michael Ware's work, if you're interested in checking out any of his reports. It started as a kind of small little project when he was on AC360 every now and again... since he moved to CNN I've had to enlarge it considerably. (What a problem to have! LOL) Anyway, it's at www.mickware.com ...

marie said...

Oy. He's leaving again? :(

Jade, thanks for giving us advance notice. Based on the comments that I have read on the AC360 blog when is in that area..I suspect there will be quite a few people who will need take extra antacids while he is reporting from Iraq.

Jade said...

Hey Cyn, welcome to the blog! I've been on your site before. Perhaps we can link each other? Let me know!

Jade

ivy said...

it didn't take long for some gossip blogs to start ripping apart AC and students who wrote about his Buffalo appearance. (apparently you can't safely call somebody inspiring anymore -) ).

About a month ago I read an interview with one of journalists who was stationed in Baghdad (don't remember the name) who said that now media companies send reporters to iraq only on volantarily basis becasue of how dangerous it got. Whoever doesn't want to go is allowed not to take the assignment. Having this in mind, Anderson should deserve some respect, you would think.

I can't understand constant unprovoked vile attacks on gossip blogs (not just one BTW). Why do they feel a need to be so unreasonably evil?

ivy said...

cyn --I've seen your site many times -- I also admire Michael Ware and run to tv every time hear his voice -) You're doing a great and much needed job. Glad to see you here!

Christiane said...

Welcome Cyn!
and yes around here we like Michael Ware... a lot!

Cyn said...

Hi, everyone, and thanks for the warm welcomes! Always glad to find more Michael fans, and of course Anderson fans as well.

Jade, I don't yet have a link system set up on my site but maybe I'll add one this weekend. I don't have a blog up because of the neocon attacks on Michael... it was hard enough cleaning their slime off the Wiki page, the YouTube posts, and out of my mailbox. Bunch o'morons...

It also seems like people still think that CNN reporters going to Baghdad are living inside the Green Zone, all tucked up and safe. I doubt Anderson will even stay close to the CNN base, he usually heads right out on embeds. So yeah, I'm stocking up on (even more) antacids! LOL

MANIFESTO

Don't think for me. Don't assume what I want to hear or read. Give me facts. Give me reasons. But not yours. Bring me debate. Enlighten me. Today, accountability is masked behind anonymity; bylines are hidden by zeros and ones. Everyone publishes; everyone is "in the know." Ethics are non-existent. Speculation is king. The truth is masked and a hostage. Empowered by our minds, WE ARE THE FREAKSPEAKERS!

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental, political, news and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such material as provided in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with the title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this blog is distributed and available without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

If your obsession against us and our content endures, you might find more information at: Law.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the blog owner.